Fixing the schools – Education (Part 3)

So, if more money and expanded government control aren’t viable solutions, what is? The best solution for getting the most students into the highest quality schools is implementing a voucher system. Two years ago the national average spent per student per school year in the public schools was $9,138. The Cato Institute released an article called Private School Costs in 2003 which said,

“The most recent figures available from the U.S. Department of Education show that in 2000 the average tuition for private elementary schools nationwide was $3,267. Government figures also indicate that 41 percent of all private elementary and secondary schools – more than 27,000 nationwide charged less than $2,500 for tuition. Less than 21 percent of all private schools charged more than $5,000 per year in tuition. According to these figures, elite and very expensive private schools tend to be the exception in their communities, not the rule.”

It seems to me that spending $9000 on a public education is a very poor investment if you could spend $3000 on a private school instead. I’ve also seen that free market competition results in much higher quality results than a government monopoly. So why do people fight so hard against the voucher programs?

In 2007 Utah had a ballot measure about school vouchers. The loudest argument I heard against vouchers was that they would take money away from our already underfunded schools. This is an interesting argument. Technically it is true; the school receives funding per student, so less students would mean less funding. However, the Utah voucher program would have continued to pay for students who switched to private schools for five years after they started attending private school. This would mean more money per student. Which is better than having more money overall. Lets say there was a school with 5 students, and they got $5,000 apiece. The school would get a total of $25,000. Then voucher programs are implemented, and one student leaves. The school would still get $2,000 for him for the next five years. So the second year there are 4 students, the school would get a total of $22,000, or $5,500 per student instead of $5,000 per student. Would you rather have $5,500 per student, or more money total? The teachers unions, ACLU and other liberal organizations were fighting for the most money for the school systems, showing that they didn’t care about having additional funding for each student, they didn’t care about smaller class sizes, and they didn’t care about some students having the opportunity to have a higher quality education. Keep in mind that the loudest opponents of the voucher system are the Teacher’s Unions. Unions exist to protect the jobs of their members. That is why unions were created. If vouchers were implemented, the lowest quality teachers would be in danger of losing their jobs, so the teachers unions will fight vouchers, even if it is not in the best interest of the students. Albert Shanker, long-time president of the American Federation of Teachers said, ”I’ll start representing kids when kids start paying union dues.” So… when the teacher’s unions spend millions of dollars sending out literature purporting that voucher systems will hurt students, I have trouble trusting their motives.

Even if the schools weren’t receiving money for students who left the system, it would still mean smaller class sizes (something generally looked at as a positive thing for school systems) and it would mean the government was spending less money on education. Right now they spend about $9,000 per student. If a voucher program was implemented where each parent could opt for $3,000 toward a private school ($3,000 was the maximum amount in Utah; according to income the vouchers ranged from $500 to $3,000 annual tuition) then each parent who chose the $3,000 (or less) would save the government at least $6,000 a year on education. It seems like an obvious choice to me. The government is taking money from you in order to provide children with an education. Doesn’t it tick you off that they are spending thousands of dollars more a year than necessary for a lower quality education? They are forcing you to pay taxes, then choosing to spend $9,000 for a public education when they could be spending $3,000 for a private education. It certainly makes me mad.

Another argument against school vouchers is that it would be directing government funds to support religious institutions, since many private schools are religious in nature. I think this could be remedied in one of two simple ways; only make secular private schools an option when using school vouchers, or turn the ’voucher’ into a ’tax break’, since the parents choosing a religious private school obviously don’t mind if their money is used to support it. Another argument I often heard was that vouchers do not help the poorest students. I really do not understand this, since “…the average tuition for private elementary schools nationwide was $3,267. Government figures also indicate that 41 percent of all private elementary and secondary schools – more than 27,000 nationwide – charged less than $2,500 for tuition9.”  If the poorest applicants get $3,000 per child per year, they shouldn’t have any trouble finding an affordable private school. Some related arguments were that the poorest students had parents who worked all the time, so they couldn’t get transportation to the schools. This may seem like a trite, compassionless answer, but if education is important to you then figure out a way. Carpool, find a friend who can drive, try to arrange your work schedule so you can get them to and from school, if they are in High School let them use public transportation. Really, lack of available transportation for some seems like a pitiful reason to deny millions of children the opportunity to receive the best education available.

When the vote was going on in Utah some of my friends voted against vouchers because they weren’t perfect. Some students still wouldn’t be able to afford the private schools, some students would choose not to, some students don’t have private schools available to them, etc. Voting against something because it wouldn’t fix all the problems seems like a counterproductive position to take. There are very few perfect solutions, very few perfect institutions in this world. To vote against something better than the current solution simply because it isn’t perfect hinders progress. Right now vouchers are the only alternative to the current educational system, and they would improve the educational opportunities for a large percent of America. If vouchers were implemented and education improved, then we would have all the less progress to make before all the remaining problems were fixed. Problems like some students not having private schools available would likely be solved automatically; if there are no competing private schools in a low-income area it would suddenly be very profitable to build the only private school available to those students and ensure that it provides a better quality education. Right now private schools are only available to higher income families. Making them available through vouchers to those who would never otherwise have had the opportunity would go a long way toward breaking the poverty cycle. Waiting around for another solution does immeasurable damage to those who could be benefiting from vouchers now.

One of the most interesting arguments I heard was from two public school teachers. They said that implementing vouchers would destroy the public school system; it would remove all of the good influences, all of the hard working students, and leave nothing but the ”dregs of society” (not my words). Without the influence of the more motivated students, the ones left in the public school system would accomplish nothing and their entire education would be wasted. This makes some interesting points. One thing it says is that smaller class size, which some teachers make out to be the Holy Grail of fixing all our educational problems (after more funding, of course), isn’t actually that great. Certainly if only the lazy, unmotivated students were left in the public school systems then we would have much smaller classes. But I guess smaller classes are only a good thing if there are good students there too. This argument also implicitly admits that keeping good students in the public school system is a detriment to them. After all, you can’t argue that the unmotivated students are influenced by the hard working students without recognizing that the hard working are also influenced by the unmotivated. So their argument for vouchers boils down to this; limit the opportunities for the students who could excel for the sake of the lazy and unmotivated.

Now that I’ve discussed the arguments against vouchers, I would like to give a couple of reasons why I support them. I’ve already mentioned the cost. I’m not a fan of unnecessarily dumping billions of tax dollars into failed government programs. If there is another way to provide every child in America with an education at potentially 1/3 the cost, I’m in support of it. The fact that it’s a better quality education is just icing on the cake. (Or ice cream on the pie, because I’m not a huge fan of cake, or icing, but dutch apple pie ala mode is way delicious.)

I also support vouchers because it gets children out of the public school systems. Now, I may sound a bit like a conspiratorialist, but I see a lot of liberal propaganda in the public schools that I don’t think every child in America should be exposed to. Things like, hey, teaching evolution as though it were an indisputable fact instead of a 200 year old theory proposed by a guy who knew nothing about cellular replication, DNA, enzymes, mutations or anything else that evolution would involve. My husband remembers being terrified in elementary school because he thought the world was going to run out of drinkable water in his lifetime. I remember asking my parents why we cut our grass, because I was taught that not cutting the grass would let it grow thicker and healthier. Environmentalism is an easy topic to indoctrinate children with. It’s easy to scare a fourth grader with descriptions of a world without trees, oceans and blue skies. I don’t really want to get into things like global warming, deforestation, pollution, etc. Maybe they are major problems. Maybe they aren’t. Whether or not they are problems is irrelevant. They are not important topics for elementary school students to be taught. I think it is much, much more important that they learn how to read, write and do math. Just take a quick look at online discussion boards and you will see that there are way too many people in America who are convinced that global warming is going to destroy us all, but they can’t formulate a grammatically correct sentence with all the words spelled right. This screams that there is something wrong with the public schools.

There are also matters of sex and drug education. I was sent to the hall once because I told my health teacher he was wasting my time; he was teaching my class of 15 year old students how to treat a hangover. I don’t think that is the schools’ responsibility. Nor do I think the schools should be teaching us how to have safe anal sex, or telling children that masturbation and porn, addictive behaviors, are normal. I know I’m opening a huge can of worms bringing these things up, but why don’t you just step back for a moment and think about what the purpose of school is. Schools exist to teach. Students should be going to school to learn English, Science, Math, History. The schools exist to prepare students to get jobs after graduating, or to go on to college. It is not the schools’ job to educate children on sex, diversity, possible environmental problems and drugs. It just isn’t. And I think it is part of the liberal agenda to normalize a world without morals. Morals are just a religious thing, religion has no place in the government, government runs the schools, so we’re going to teach children all about sex and drugs so they think it’s normal.  (There is a very good discussion of that theory here; I think the assessment might be a little harsh, but at the same time, I can’t think of a better explanation for why Liberals think the way they do.)  Just a few examples are: Obama appointing the director of the Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools a man who taught High School children about fisting.  Or a Helena school’s sex ed goals:  “By fifth grade, they are taught there are several types of intercourse, and by the sixth grade, the draft document states that students should, “Understand that sexual intercourse includes but is not limited to vaginal, oral, or anal penetration; using the penis, fingers, tongue or objects.”  That’s some dirty stuff.  For ten-year-olds.  Do you want your beautiful six year old daughter taught that she could be a little boy, and that’s okay?  Would it surprise you to find out that this gender diversity program was funded by the California Teacher’s Union?  The result; 2nd graders having oral sex in school. Only a liberal would be surprised that the younger you start teaching kids about sex, the younger they start having sex.

I would much rather have my children in a private school, where they aren’t taught that everyone is having sex and everyone tries drinking and drugs at some point. (If you’re thinking to yourself, ’well, everyone does have sex and everyone does try drinking and drugs,’ you are wrong. I was a virgin when I got married. I have never had any illegal drug, I’ve never tried cigarettes, I’ve never had alcohol. The mentality that everyone does it is a lie, and it is meant to normalize inappropriate behavior. Because if everyone believes that everyone is doing it, then over time it becomes more and more true.) The best reason for supporting a voucher program goes back to the qualities of a free market. When your tax dollars are supporting the public school system they have no accountability to you. The administration (and boy, are there a lot of them) and the teachers get their paychecks no matter what quality of education your child is getting.

And if you don’t like their policies, you have no recourse. If you can use your tax dollars to send your child to a private school instead, then you can choose the education you want them to have. Maybe you do think that sex, drug and environmental education is important to prepare your child for life in this world. If that is the case, then send them to a school that covers all that. That’s fine by me!  If you would rather your child focus on math and science, send them to a school that focuses on technical subjects. If you would like to give your child a religious setting for their education, choose a religious private school. If you find out your child’s teacher can’t pass a 10th grade level literacy test (Coulson, Andrew J.  Market Education  (140-141).  Copyright © 1998, Andrew J. Coulson.), get them put in a different class or a different school. The great thing about a free market is that it tends to be self-regulating. Private schools know that parents want their children to have quality teachers, so they hire quality teachers. Public schools know that parents don’t have a choice, so they hire whoever they can and that person immediately joins a teacher’s union and can’t be fired. Kind of a sick cycle, isn’t it? I would rather send my children to a school that is accountable to its customers, not accountable to the government.

Just a few final thoughts. Nothing I say should be interpreted to mean that all public schools are horrible, or even inadequate. I was quite lucky to go to a wonderful school where I feel I was able to learn and prepare for college. If I had been given the choice to attend a private school, I think I would have stayed in my public school, despite any problems it may have had. What I am supporting is having that choice, so that students who are not satisfied with their public school can choose something different. I do not think the government should take sole responsibility for educating America’s youth, and I believe the current level of government control has led to much poorer quality school systems, full of wasteful spending, unnecessary bureaucracy, and a frightening amount of time being spent on teaching liberal agendas.

I think the fear of losing control over what is being taught in the school systems is the reason liberal groups fight so hard against vouchers. Although I think vouchers would improve the quality of education, I think the single most important thing that could be done is for parents to be involved. They should expect their children to go to college. They should help their children study. They should teach their children respect. If every child in America had parents who taught them to respect adults and value their education, there would be a transformation in the schools overnight. However, good parenting is not something that can be legislated. If vouchers are not available then the next best option is to give teachers the power to discipline disruptive students and to hire teachers who know their sub jects, not just how to teach. Vouchers are the best solution for improving the schools in this nation, but even the best schools are worthless if the parents haven’t taught their children the importance of hard work.


About whyimconservative

I'm a stay-at-home, homeschooling mom with a Biochemistry degree living in Austin. I love my kids, my husband and my country. I want to explain why I'm conservative.

Posted on June 15, 2011, in Education and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 6 Comments.

  1. Very good post. I enjoyed every word. The mixture of fact and jocularity (cake and pie comment) made it so.
    I also learned some things and I’m going to follow your links to see what else I can learn.
    Once again, Very good post. I’ll be sharing it.

  2. I followed your links and I learned or should say was reminded that there are some sick peole in this world. Sex ed should be left up to parents I think, but since some parents don’t prepare their kids perhaps there should be sex ed in school. But by no means should it be as early as kindergarden. I would think closer to puberty would be more appropriate. I’m not a parent so I really can’t speak to this issue.

  3. Couple of problems I see with vouchers:

    1.) It doesn’t allow a true free market for schools since the family takes the voucher to the school which redeems it for the money. I can see the government getting heavy handed in choosing which institutions they will give vouchers to and those they won’t. This is why I favor a tax credit rather than vouchers.

    2. Specifically in Utah the source of the money was very ambiguous. They said it would come out of the general fund which means they were not necessarily appropriating or budgeting the money.

    Other than that vouchers are great. By the way, that argument about government funds getting used for religious institutions reflects the attitude of a big government proponent. The money is the government’s not the citizen’s. I guess the property you pay taxes on is not really yours either, the government just lets you use it.

    Whether you rent (indirectly) or own you pay property taxes and are thus entitled to the use of those funds by the government. If you do not want to use those government services then you should be allowed to redirect that money towards a similar service of your choosing.
    But that might leave some kids behind. The callous yet indefensible response is: what do I owe those kids? The even more important question is what do I owe my kids? The answer to the former question is not a mediocre education at the expense of my children’s chances for a good education.

  4. it’s ridiculous that they would need ‘funding’ for it. If they’re spending $9,000 a year on a student, then they don’t need funding to give him $3,000 to go to a public school. It also nauseates me how the government assumes all the money we have just belongs to them, and anything they let us keep is a gift. Like when liberals talk about not being able to ‘afford’ tax cuts. It’s my money. Ownership really is a foreign concept to liberals.

    • I completely agree with everything you said.

      It completely ticks me off that students are being taught sex ed at such a young age. Just like that legislation that children as young as 5 or so should be taught that being gay isn’t only acceptable, but preferred, is ludicrous. These children barely know the difference between male and female by this point, so why teach them that? Granted, I don’t have children yet, so I would’t have a lot of knowledge about this…

      You said that someone else said that “they would take money away from our already underfunded schools”. A lot of property tax money is used to fund the public schools, so aren’t the “underfunded” schools pretty much recieving free money from parents who send their kids to private school?

      I think the lazy, uninterested students left behind in the public schools will help motivate each other to an extent. My parents explained time and time again that school was important, and I was always above my peers in grades, but for some reason, I didn’t care at first. The teachers said nothing about the underachievers, both because I feel they didn’t care,they got paid regardless, and the ones that did care weren’t allowed to do anything about it. I was motivated to work harder because of the lazy students; I didn’t want to be a part of them. You are completely right about being lazy! It is far easier to be lazy than it is to be hard working. The students of the poor see that there will always be people forced to pay the government to take care of them, and they are taught that they don’t have to worry about anything, the liberals will take care of them, so they don’t try. Some of them do escape the dream world that has been set up for them by the liberals, but most of them fall back on welfare and affirmative action. I think Martin Luther King, Jr. would be turning in his grave at how most of the black population chooses to live! He spoke and preached that they were equal to the white man, that they can work with the whites to make the world a better place! Yet now, they are perfectly happy living off welfare and making children with no intention of taking care of them. Too often I see posts about how a black boy (and I say boy because he is a boy, although he sees himself as a “man”) says he won’t pay child support to a second woman because he can barely afford to pay child support to his first woman. Most of them think they have pride, yet they absolutely have none if they are happy to drain money from those who choose to achieve.

      A “frightening amount of time being spent on teaching liberal agendas” is absolutely right. In my high school, we had block schedules, which is 90 minutes of class and 4 classes a day. My American History teacher would spend at least 45 of the minutes talking about John Kerry and about liberal garbage, all the while complaining that history should be a full year class and there wasn’t enough time to teach everything. Even more pathetic: I got 20 points extra credit for watching the b.s movie “An Inconvenient Truth”, which was shown by the SCHOOL. By the end of the semester, I had a 182% in the class (yes you read that right, one hundred and eighty two percent). When the teacher found out I was “republican” (I’m not sure if conservative was a term used back in 2006-2007), she told me she used to think so highly of me. Wait, what? I have 182% in your class, I’m obviously willing to put in extra work to make a good grade in your class, but now I’m dirt because I don’t agree with you? I seriously wanted to stop going to school. Not to the point of quitting though, because I knew there was more and better than her, but still…

      Great piece about your view! I love reading through your posts and seeing things that make sense!

  5. As far as funding for the Utah program goes, I can see where it would be ambiguous. The state sets aside X dollars for this year. In order to fund the new voucher program it would have to set aside X + Y dollars next year. What if the legislatures reduces X? It can do that at any time and suddenly the schools have few dollars.

    That’s not the real trouble with vouchers though.

    It’s a problem of backward thinking.

    Your local school district is owned by its patrons but they don’t act like it. We look to Washington to run our schools when in reality, they do not. They belong to and are supported by us, through our tax dollars. The things students are taught are determined my national policy that is questionably constitutional. A school district should be viewed as a local government, independent due to federalism, serving the educational needs of the local community. That would solve a great deal of the problems in our local school districts.

    Economically speaking, our private schools would not respond in the way that voucher system supporters think they would.

    Private schools are built by private funds and meant to give their patrons an advantage over public school….. but not meant to be profitable. Those in wealthy areas are built, maintained, and expanded by those living in wealthy neighborhoods. There are other private schools in buildings and facilities subsidized by churches and other organizations. In our public schools, our buildings are funded and maintained by local bonds and tax dollars. That is one reason why it seems public education is so much more expensive.

    My sister-in-law sends her boys to a private, Christian school. In addition to tuition and transportation, they hold fundraisers throughout the year to raise hundreds of thousands of dollars. The parents were asked to provide donated flowers and decorations for every banquet, graduation ceremony, and dance.

    I can’t recall any substantial donation to our school district that didn’t go onto the football field or some such thing.

    Private schools are not profit earning schools and that is why a lot of our free enterprise models won’t work. They are established with private funds and operate so that their students can learn outside of the public school systems. In order to accommodate the flood of students using vouchers there would need to be hundreds of new private schools. Where would the funds come from to build them? Hundreds of millions of dollars would need to be poured into the buildings alone. Because there is no profit to be made no one in his or her right mind would “invest” in building a private school.

    Transportation is an issue. We are required to transport students to public schools (and get state money to do so) because meeting the requirements of the 14th Amendment require us to be sure every child has access to school. The parents of the kids who would use the vouchers would sue to make sure that transportation dollars went to their kids if it were a challenge or inconvenience to take them to school.

    I could, given a free hand, do much to improve teacher quality and cut costs. Try this:

    Eliminate all sports and extra-curricular activities. Schools would be for education only. Parents and communities can fund sports and extra curricular activities if they deem them needed. Heck, even the state could use some of the money saved to fund state athletic and other eliminated activities.

    Freed from coaching, teachers would be simply teachers. School would only be about education. I’m told that football and other activities are often the only things keeping kids in school. I say that someone who doesn’t value their education problem won’t get one by sitting in my classroom waiting for practice to start.

    Next, remove all responsibilities from the national department of education except for enforcing the equal protection clause and establishing guidelines and funding for special education. Let the local schools be governed by the community and funded locally and by the state.

    Vouchers wouldn’t work for most of the students in struggling schools, wouldn’t help struggling schools improve, and don’t make economic sense. Besides, it would be foolhardy to tie the fortunes of a private school to vouchers. They are as likely to be cut as anything else when times get hard.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: